BARON DAVID WARD

LLOYDS BANK & CORPORATE FRAUD

Lloyds Bank plc, a body corporate which, as with every other CORPS, requires the WET INK SIGNATURE of the Party's for any agreement. Any (sic) "CONTRACT" which is not properly executed - wet signed and with mutual consideration is a fraudulent instrument. e-Contracts are, by definition thro the deliberate omission is a fraud.

01-SEP-25 Baron David Ward is a repository for many of the Affidavit and Liens which all aim to disabuse the misled of the actual FACTS the liens:

A look at any of the (sic) laws "signed in to law" shows, the CORPS requirement for either a wet-signature or a Seal on any instrument in order to 'execute' it. As no man has granted CIIIR, his antecedents, predecessors or successors any Power of Attorney there is no authority granted to say any man must follow the Corporate laws. No man could ever grant Power of Attorney over another in perpetuity meaning each man would have to agree to each and every corporate officer created by CIIIR and the like. A claim of Power of Attorney without execution of the contract is fraud. A claim of perpetual Power of Attorney is fraud. All is fraud under their own rules as there is an absence of mutual consideration and the consideration favours only the corporation, and never reveals to any man, the absence of authority to create any law by which any man outwith the corporation must follow.

20:24 Just by looking at their own corporate (sic) COURT rules, brings to light the fraudulent nature of those other corporations doing business with Llloyds for example the COURTS.

The alledged courts case number is not recognised by the Ministry of Justice who oversee HMCTS as evidenced by SAR requests which come back "CASE NOT FOUND. The alledged courts refuse to show the paperwork submitted--in direct breach of CPR 83.2 & CPR 83.13(8)(a)

Under CPR 83.2 & CPR 83.13(8)(a) A warrant of control may only be issued following a valid court order...which must be issued and sealed by a court officer. It is essential that this warrant is signed and properly sealed to be valid...without the proper court seal and signature, the warrant cannot be deemed to have been lawfully issued, and thus cannot support any action of enforcement.

13-SEP-19 SUBMISSION OF SUBJECT ACCESS REQUEST No1

LLOYDS ignore SUBJECT ACCESS No1 LLOYDS goes as far as to incorrectly state on 31-OCT-19, that one must subject themselves to the internal rules of the CORPORATION of LLOYDS Bank plc and fill in their forms before they have to complete the SAR. When this is answered 12-NOV-19 that this is factually incorreect, they ignore the SAR request altogether.

-sep-21 SUBMISSION OF SUBJECT ACCESS REQUEST No2

LLOYDS after acknowledging the SUBJECT ACCESS No2 on 15-OCT-21, LLOYDS proceed to incorrectly that second SAR request. We have the same scenario--LLOYDS BANK plc ignore the SAR No3.

24-JUL-22 SUBMISSION OF SUBJECT ACCESS REQUEST to the CORPS officer DOMINIC RAAB MP

Lloyds Bank plc after ignoring 3 SUBJECT ACCESS REQUESTs, decide to make a fictitious Court claim through the body corporate of HMCTS. An unliveried and unexecuted sheet of paper arrives with a reference number upon it which is queried with the corporate office of The Ministry of Justice, whereby, one of their officers states that there is no recorded "court case number" of that reference. HMCTS is asked for the case file and all the contents, and refuse to produce the case file--either in full or in part:just as LLOYDS do, HMCTS just ignore all requests.

07-AUG-22 NON COMPLIANCE TO THREE SUBJECT ACCESS REQUESTs submitted to the INFORMATION COMMISSIONERS OFFICE

A package is sent-RECORDED DELIVERY-to the ICO who purportedly 'oversee' the COPMPLIANCE with GDPR and lo, what do the ICO do? Ignore the reporting of 3 unanswered SARs by LLOYDS BANK pLc. Then when the non-action by the ICO is reported to them, they claim that due to the time since the SARs were submitted to LLOYDS BANK plc, there is nothing the ICO can do. So we are going to be forced to submit SAR4 to LLOYDS BANK but in the meantime, LLOYDS BANK plc galvanises a plot and aided and abetted by non othere than HMCTS produces another fraudulent Warrant--again unliveried and unexecuted properly. LLOYDS BANK plc, their paid lackeys of solicitors and HMCTS are all asked for proof of the court case, the case file, the proof of any debt non of which is forthcoming.

01-NOV-23 UNKNOWN PEOPLE PROWLING AROUND OUR HOUSE our cameras catching them trying to break in again.

13-NOV-23 HMCTS ARMED POLICE ABERDEIN CONSIDINE SOLICITORS CLEARWAY LOCKSMITHS AND UNIDENTIFIED OTHERS BREAK IN TO PROVIDE LLOYDS BANK plc FRAUDULENT GAIN

The corporations of Armed police and HMCTS break in to my home, forcibly removing me. Subsequently they do a quick deal with Rightmove, Zoopla, HM LAND REGISTRY and Estate Agents to sell my home for far less than its worth and without a shred of proof of my ownership being relinquished. There are no signatures, no contracts nothing for these acts of in terrorem fraud. No one's real property is safe.

There is no adhering to CPR rules, the FRAUD ACT as they have the corporations of police, solicitors, courts in their hand. All they have is in terrorem fraud.

Since the Non-COMPLIANCE with SAR 4 was submitted to the ICO, they have failed to respond.

...

Who are you guys?

• 

  503 04-DEC-21 HOHO44597

  LLOYDS BANK PLC David William Leon Chalmers CEO

• 

  503 26-MAY-23 HOHO167

  LLOYDS BANK PLC CHARLES ALAN NUNN CEO

AFFIDAVIT LIENS & SUBJECT ACCESS REQUESTS